<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Aman Bagale]]></title><description><![CDATA[Aman Bagale]]></description><link>https://blog.amanbagale.com.np</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:26:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.amanbagale.com.np/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[My 4th Attempt at AI/ML]]></title><description><![CDATA[So this was my 4th attempt at it. I come from a development background, so it was more of a learning by doing/coding thing.

I was always good at maths (or so I think), and it made sense to me — the concepts, proofs, the language of maths itself. So,...]]></description><link>https://blog.amanbagale.com.np/my-4th-attempt-at-aiml</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://blog.amanbagale.com.np/my-4th-attempt-at-aiml</guid><category><![CDATA[Computer Science]]></category><category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category><category><![CDATA[AI]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aman Bagale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:31:58 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this was <strong>my 4th attempt</strong> at it. I come from a development background, so it was more of a learning by doing/coding thing.</p>
<p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/1*cpu8l60UM9LkzpQuSOn-LQ.png" alt /></p>
<p>I was always good at maths (or so I think), and it made sense to me — the concepts, proofs, the language of maths itself. So, I decided to jump into what this field has to offer, as they say it had a bunch of maths. And yes, it was a bunch of maths and theory, which was very opposite of what I did as a developer. Paper-pen with concepts learning was the key, and intuition to what exactly and how exactly things (regression/classification, models, tensors, ANN, CNN, RNN) worked as they are.</p>
<p>So 1st attempt was in my 2nd year I guess. It was from Coursera’s <strong>Andrew NG’s</strong> course. TBH, I was just parrot-learning, making Notion notes, and because even if I understood the maths of schools and colleges, it was quite different when it was not on paper and done in head (as dev habit). I was quite overwhelmed, and I convinced myself that I knew what I was learning until I did not. Soon, of course, the spark was all gone. I, as almost many people do, dropped it.</p>
<p>Fast forward, I went on YouTube learning through tutors like <strong>Krish Naik</strong>, 100 days of ML, <strong>CampusX</strong> (<em>he is the goat, btw</em>) 100 days of DL. At this point, I think I made myself comfortable with all the jargons in this field, but still it wasn’t clicking as it should (resistance free).</p>
<p>Press enter or click to view image in full size</p>
<p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/1*yQn4kldwUcqn0vympUdo5g.jpeg" alt /></p>
<p>Then I had subjects like <strong><em>Numerical Methods</em></strong> in 4th sem I guess, which felt somewhat similar to what I’d studied in classical ML. Then came 5th sem, the foundational subject “<strong><em>Probability and Statistics.</em></strong>” I had learned fundamental concepts like probability distributions, random variables, central limit theorem, and it was quite fascinating.</p>
<p>Press enter or click to view image in full size</p>
<p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/1*1ony-7eDE6u9TxHha22ifQ.jpeg" alt /></p>
<p>Finally, after my 5th sem, I am getting interested in Engineering as a whole. Subjects like COA, Data Communication were peak. I had a burning desire to learn anything on my way, and this time my rate of learning, ability to grasp concepts quickly overshoot — it felt good.</p>
<p>Now, the 4th attempt, which was mentioned at the starting context:</p>
<p>The day-to-day coding felt monotonous and not mentally stimulating enough — less of my interest, to put it correctly. Don’t get me wrong, there are fields like <strong>cloud, data, system design, LLD</strong> that I find fascinating. But the regular development work wasn’t scratching that itch.</p>
<p>I never understood this research thingy — getting papers published and going on to pursue masters in field of interest under TA/RA-ship. I wanted to read papers and get familiar with this world. PyTorch came into my mind, and it indeed was the go-to tool for modeling and referenced by many AI researchers for their research.</p>
<p>I found a playlist of CampusX on it: Practical <strong>Deep Learning with PyTorch</strong>. And trust me, it was gold. I finally feel much less resistance in learning and implementing stuff like <strong>ANN, CNN, RNN</strong>. It was creating a base for my deep learning understanding. I revisited concepts like activation functions, normal training pipeline (forward pass, loss calculation, back propagation, optimize). I understood the difference between SGD and batch-GD. The thing is, everything is clicking very nicely.</p>
<p>It isn’t that I’ve gained a lot of knowledge — some of my friends are into this field and are learning them from 1st principles, good for them. It’s that I’ve hopped onto too many fields: <strong>design, dev, editing and this</strong>. So, it has become quite clear to me as to what not to do and what to do, to some extent. And trust me, this clarity is very comforting. The <strong>math is mathing</strong>, my <em>cognitive</em> and <em>critical thinking</em> ability has improved quite a lot.</p>
<p>This was a very vague and not-so-coherent way of me dealing with this to document somewhere. So that was it, thank you :)</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>